The Mind of an Inventor: The Common Thread of Creation

A collaboration between Lewis McLain & AI



I. Introduction — The Spark That Changes the World

Every great invention begins not in a laboratory but in a restless mind that refuses to accept things as they are. The inventor lives in the thin air between wonder and frustration: the wonder of seeing what might be, and the frustration that it does not yet exist.

To invent is to cross the border between imagination and matter—between “why not?” and “now it works.” Across centuries, the world’s greatest inventors have built in different mediums—stone, steam, circuits, code—yet share the same mental wiring: curiosity that won’t rest, courage that won’t quit, and a faith that imagination can serve humanity.


II. The Inventive Mindset

The inventor’s mind is a paradox. It thrives on both chaos and order, fantasy and formula.

  • Curiosity is its compass—an ache to understand how things work and how they could work better.
  • Observation is its lens—seeing patterns others overlook.
  • Playfulness is its fuel—testing ideas without fear of failure.
  • Persistence is its backbone—enduring the thousand prototypes that don’t succeed.

Failure doesn’t frighten the inventor; indifference does. To stop asking “why” is a far greater tragedy than a circuit that burns or a model that breaks.


III. Ten Inventors, Ten Windows into the Mind of Creation

Leonardo da Vinci — Sketching the Sky Before It Existed

Leonardo filled his notebooks with wings, gears, and impossible dreams. He studied the curve of a bird’s feather as if decoding a sacred language.

“Once you have tasted flight,” he wrote, “you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward.”
He painted with one hand and designed with the other, proving that art and engineering are not rivals but reflections. His flying machines never left the ground, yet every modern aircraft carries a trace of his ink.


Benjamin Franklin — Harnessing Heaven for Humanity

Franklin saw storms not as terrors but as teachers. He tied a key to a kite and coaxed lightning to reveal its secret kinship with electricity.

“Electric fire,” he marveled, “is of the same kind with that which is in the clouds.”
The lightning rod followed—a humble spike that saved countless roofs. His bifocals, his stove, his civic inventions all arose from empathy: an elder’s eyes, a neighbor’s cold house, a printer’s smoky air. He turned curiosity into charity.


Eli Whitney — The Engineer Who Made Things Fit

Whitney watched field hands comb seeds from cotton and thought, There must be a better way. His wire-toothed drum and brush—the cotton gin—sped production a hundredfold.

“It was a small thing,” he later said, “but small things change empires.”
The gin enriched the South and, tragically, deepened slavery. Seeking redemption through precision, Whitney built the first system of interchangeable parts, proving that uniformity could multiply freedom of production. He changed not just a crop but the logic of industry.


Thomas Edison — The Factory of Light

At Menlo Park, light spilled from the windows while others slept. Inside, hundreds of filaments burned and failed.

“I haven’t failed,” Edison smiled. “I’ve found ten thousand ways that won’t work.”
When carbonized bamboo finally glowed for 1,200 hours, he built an entire electric ecosystem—power plants, wiring, meters, sockets. His true invention was not the bulb but the process of systematic innovation itself.


Nikola Tesla — The Dream That Outran Its Century

Tesla lived amid lightning of his own making. To him, the universe pulsed with invisible currents waiting to be tamed.

“The moment I imagine a device,” he claimed, “I can make it run in my mind.”
His AC induction motor and polyphase system powered cities from Niagara Falls. His dream of wireless energy bankrupted him but electrified the future. In him, imagination was not daydreaming—it was blueprinting.


Marie Curie — The Glow of the Invisible

In a shed that smelled of acid and hope, Curie boiled tons of pitchblende until a speck of radium glowed.

“Nothing in life is to be feared,” she said, “it is only to be understood.”
Her discovery of radioactivity opened new worlds of medicine and physics. During World War I she outfitted trucks with X-rays, saving thousands of soldiers. Science for her was not ambition—it was service illuminated.


The Wright Brothers — Learning the Language of Air

In their Dayton workshop, the Wrights balanced on wings of wood and faith. They built a wind tunnel, measured lift with bicycle parts, and studied every gust as if air itself were a textbook.

“The bird doesn’t just rise,” Wilbur observed, “it balances.”
Their 1903 flight at Kitty Hawk lasted only seconds, yet the world’s horizon shifted forever. They proved that methodical curiosity could conquer gravity itself.


Albert Einstein — Thought as an Instrument

Einstein’s laboratory was his imagination. He pictured himself chasing a beam of light and realized time might bend to keep pace.

“Imagination,” he said, “is more important than knowledge.”
From that image grew relativity, which remade physics. Yet his most practical insight—the photoelectric effect—became the foundation of solar power. Einstein invented with ideas instead of tools, showing that creativity can re-engineer reality.


Steve Jobs — The Art of Simplicity

Jobs demanded elegance as fiercely as others demanded speed. He fused hardware and software into harmony.

“It just works,” he’d say, though it took a thousand revisions to reach that ease.
The Mac, the iPod, the iPhone—each was less a gadget than a philosophy: that design is love made visible. Jobs reinvented the personal device by stripping it down until only meaning remained.


Tim Berners-Lee — The Architect of the Digital Commons

In a corridor at CERN, Berners-Lee envisioned scientists everywhere linking their work with one simple syntax.

“I just wanted a way for people to share what they knew.”
He built HTTP, HTML, and the first web server—then released them freely. No patents, no gatekeepers. His generosity made the World Wide Web the shared library of humankind.


Together they form a single conversation across centuries. Leonardo sketched the dream of flight; the Wrights gave it wings. Franklin tamed electricity; Tesla made it sing; Edison wired it into homes. Curie revealed invisible forces; Einstein explained them. Jobs and Berners-Lee re-channeled that same human spark into light made of code. Each voice answers the one before it, echoing: The world can be improved, and I will try.


IV. The Invisible Thread — Purpose and Pattern

Behind every experiment lies a conviction: that the universe is intelligible and worth improving.
Their shared geometry is imagination → iteration → illumination.
They teach that invention is not chaos but a form of hope—faith that our designs, however imperfect, can serve life itself. The true legacy of invention is not a patent portfolio; it is a pattern of thinking that turns wonder into welfare.


V. Conclusion — Love, Made Useful

The mind of an inventor is not born whole. It is forged in curiosity, hammered by failure, and tempered by empathy. These ten lives remind us that progress is a moral act, rooted in patience and compassion.

To think like an inventor is to love the world enough to fix it—to build not merely for profit or prestige but for people yet unborn. Invention, at its purest, is love that learned to use its hands.


Appendix — Biographical Notes and Key Inventions

Leonardo da Vinci — Italian polymath; foresaw helicopters, tanks, and canal locks through meticulous study of anatomy and motion.
Key: flight sketches, helical air screw, gear systems.

Benjamin Franklin — Printer, scientist, diplomat; proved lightning’s electrical nature; invented lightning rod, bifocals, Franklin stove.
Key: electrical experiments, civic innovations.

Eli Whitney — American engineer; built the cotton gin and standardized interchangeable parts for firearms, shaping mass production.
Key: cotton gin, precision tooling.

Thomas Edison — Inventor-entrepreneur; created the practical light system, phonograph, and motion picture camera; pioneered industrial R&D.
Key: incandescent lamp, phonograph, Kinetoscope.

Nikola Tesla — Serbian-American engineer; developed AC motors, polyphase power, radio principles, and the Tesla coil.
Key: alternating-current system, wireless power concepts.

Marie Curie — Physicist-chemist; discovered radium and polonium; founded radiology; first double Nobel laureate.
Key: radioactivity research, mobile X-rays.

Orville & Wilbur Wright — American aviation pioneers; invented three-axis control, conducted first powered flight.
Key: controlled flight, wind-tunnel data.

Albert Einstein — Theoretical physicist; formulated relativity, explained photoelectric effect, father of modern physics.
Key: relativity, photoelectric effect.

Steve Jobs — Apple co-founder; integrated technology and design into consumer art; drove personal computing and mobile revolutions.
Key: Macintosh, iPod/iTunes, iPhone, iPad.

Tim Berners-Lee — British computer scientist; created the World Wide Web’s foundational architecture and kept it open.
Key: URL, HTTP, HTML, first web server/browser.


🎨 Painting Concept: “The Council of Inventors”

Setting:
A softly lit Renaissance-style hall that feels timeless — stone arches overhead, candlelight mingling with the faint glow of electricity. At the center, a great oak table curves like an infinity symbol, symbolizing endless human curiosity. Around it, the ten inventors gather in dialogue — not chronological, but thematic, their inventions subtly illuminating the room.


Foreground Figures

  • Leonardo da Vinci stands near the left, sketchbook open, gesturing midair with a quill as though explaining the curvature of wings. His gaze meets the Wright Brothers, who are bent over a small model glider resting on the table.
  • Benjamin Franklin leans in nearby, one hand on a metal key, the other holding a faintly glowing lightning rod that arcs softly — the light blending into the candle glow.
  • Across from him, Edison adjusts a glowing bulb, its light reflecting in Franklin’s spectacles. Behind him, Nikola Tesla gazes upward, a tiny arc of blue current jumping between his fingertips, illuminating the diagram behind them.

Middle Figures

  • Eli Whitney sits near the table’s midpoint, hands on precision tools and calipers, his musket parts laid out like a puzzle. The Wright Brothers’ propeller model rests beside his gear molds, symbolizing the bridge between ground and air.
  • Marie Curie stands slightly apart, her face serene but determined, holding a small vial that emits a gentle ethereal light — a faint halo of pale blue radiance, illuminating her lab notes.
  • Albert Einstein leans over her shoulder, pipe in hand, scribbling light equations on a parchment that glow faintly, as if chalked by photons.

Background Figures

  • Steve Jobs is seated farther right, dressed in his signature black turtleneck — timeless among them — explaining the first iPhone to Tim Berners-Lee, who nods thoughtfully while holding a glowing string of code shaped like a thread of light. Between them, a subtle digital aura rises — a lattice of glowing lines suggesting the web connecting every mind in the room.

Drones as a Core Municipal Utility: Policy, Training, and Future Directions for Texas Cities

A collaboration between Lewis McLain and AI



Executive Summary

Municipal drone programs have rapidly evolved from experimental projects to dependable service tools. Today, Texas cities are beginning to treat drones not as gadgets but as core municipal utilities—shared resources as essential as fleet management, radios, or GIS. Properly implemented, drones can provide faster response times, safer job conditions, and higher-quality data, all while saving taxpayer money.

This paper explains how cities can build and sustain a municipal drone program. It examines current and emerging use cases, outlines staffing impacts, surveys training options and costs in Texas, explores fleet models and procurement, and considers the legal, policy, and community dimensions that must be addressed. It concludes with recommendations, case studies of failures, and appendices on payload regulation and FAA sample exam questions.

Handled wisely, drones will make cities safer, smarter, and more responsive. Mishandled, they risk creating public backlash, wasting funds, or even eroding trust.



The Case for Treating Drones as a Utility

Cities that succeed with drones do so by thinking of them as utilities, not toys. A drone program should be centrally governed, jointly funded, and transparently managed. Just like a municipal fleet or IT department, a citywide drone service must be reliable, equitable across departments, compliant with law, interoperable with other systems, and transparent to the public.

This approach ensures that drones are available where needed, that policies are consistent across departments, and that costs are shared fairly. Most importantly, it signals to residents that the city treats drone use seriously, with strong safeguards and clear accountability.



Current and Growing Uses

Across Texas and the country, municipal drones already serve a wide range of functions.

Public Safety: Police and fire agencies use drones as “first responders,” launching them from stations or rooftops to 911 calls. They provide live video of car crashes, fires, or hazardous scenes, often arriving before officers. Firefighters use drones with thermal cameras to locate victims or track hotspots in burning buildings.

Infrastructure and Public Works: Drones inspect bridges, culverts, roofs, and water towers. Instead of sending workers onto scaffolds or into confined spaces, crews now fly drones that capture detailed photos and 3D models. Landfills are surveyed from the air, methane leaks identified, and storm damage mapped quickly after major events.

Transportation and Planning: Drones monitor traffic flow, study queue lengths, and document work zones. City planners use them to create up-to-date maps, support zoning decisions, and maintain digital twins of urban areas.

Environmental and Health: From checking stormwater outfalls to mapping tree canopies, drones help environmental staff monitor city assets. In some regions, drones are used to identify standing water and apply larvicides for mosquito control.

Emergency Management: After floods, hurricanes, or tornadoes, drones provide rapid situational awareness, helping cities prioritize response and document damage for FEMA claims.

As automation improves, “drone-in-a-box” systems—drones that launch on schedule or in response to sensors—will soon become common municipal tools.



Staffing Impacts

A common fear is that drones will replace jobs. In practice, they save lives and money while creating new roles.

Jobs Saved: By reducing risky tasks like climbing scaffolds or entering confined spaces, drones make existing jobs safer. They also reduce overtime by finishing inspections or surveys in hours instead of days.

Jobs Added: Cities now employ drone program coordinators, FAA Part 107-certified pilots, data analysts, and compliance officers. A medium-sized Texas city might add ten to twenty such roles over the next five years.

Jobs Shifted: Inspectors, police officers, and firefighters increasingly become “drone-enabled” workers, adding aerial operations to their responsibilities. Over time, 5–10% of municipal staff in critical departments may be retrained in drone use.

The net result is redistribution rather than reduction. Drones are not eliminating jobs; they are elevating them.



Training in Texas

FAA rules require every commercial or government drone operator to hold a Part 107 Remote Pilot Certificate. Fortunately, Texas offers many affordable training options.

Community colleges such as Midland College and South Plains College provide Part 107 prep and hands-on flight training, typically costing $350 to $450 per course. Private providers like Dronegenuity and From Above Droneworks offer in-person and hybrid courses ranging from $99 online modules to $1,200 full academies. San Jacinto College and other universities run short workshops and certification tracks.

Online exam prep courses are widely available for $150–$400, making it feasible to train multiple staff at once. When departments train together, cities often negotiate group discounts and host joint scenario days at municipal training grounds.


Fleet Models and Costs

Municipal needs vary, but most cities benefit from a tiered fleet.

  • Micro drones (under 250g) for training and quick checks: $500–$1,200.
  • Utility quads for mapping and inspection: $2,500–$6,500.
  • Enterprise drones with thermal sensors for public safety: $7,500–$16,000.
  • Heavy-lift or VTOL systems for long corridors or specialized sensors: $18,000–$45,000+.

Each drone has a three- to five-year lifespan, with batteries refreshed every 200–300 cycles. Cities must also budget for accessories, insurance, and management software.



Policy and Legal Landscape

Federally, the FAA regulates drone operations under Part 107. Rules limit altitude to 400 feet, require flights within visual line of sight, and mandate Remote ID for most aircraft. Waivers can allow for advanced operations, such as flying beyond visual line of sight (BVLOS).

In Texas, additional laws restrict image capture in certain contexts and impose rules around critical infrastructure. Local governments cannot regulate airspace, but they can and should regulate employee conduct, data use, privacy, and procurement.

Transparency is crucial. Cities must publish clear retention policies, flight logs, and citizen FAQs.


Privacy, Labor, and Community Trust

For communities to embrace drones, cities must be proactive.

Privacy: Drones should collect only what is necessary, with cameras pointed at mission targets rather than private backyards. Non-evidentiary footage should be deleted within 30–90 days.

Labor: Cities should emphasize that drones augment rather than replace workers. They shift dangerous tasks to machines while providing staff new certifications and career paths.

Equity: Larger cities may advance faster than small towns, but shared services, inter-local agreements, and regional training programs can close the gap.

Community Trust: Transparency builds legitimacy. Cities should publish quarterly metrics, log complaints, host public demos, and maintain a clear point of contact for concerns.


Lessons from Failures

Not every program has succeeded. Across the country, drone initiatives have stumbled in predictable ways:

  • Community Pushback: Chula Vista’s pioneering drone-as-first-responder program drew criticism for surveillance concerns, while New York City’s holiday monitoring drones sparked public backlash. Lesson: transparency and engagement must come first.
  • Operational Incidents: A Charlotte police drone crashed into a house, and some agencies lost FAA waivers due to compliance lapses. Lesson: one mistake can jeopardize an entire program; training and discipline are essential.
  • Budget Failures: Dallas and other cities saw expansions stall over hidden costs for software and maintenance. Smaller towns wasted funds buying consumer drones that quickly wore out. Lesson: plan for lifecycle costs, not just hardware.
  • Legal Overreach: Connecticut’s proposal to arm police drones with “less-lethal” weapons collapsed amid backlash, while San Diego faced court challenges over warrant requirements. Lesson: pushing boundaries invites restrictions.
  • Scaling Gaps: Rural Texas counties bought drones with grants but lacked certified pilots or insurance. Small towns gathered imagery but had no analysts to use it. Lesson: drones without people and integration are wasted purchases.

Recommendations

  1. Invest in training through Texas colleges and private providers.
  2. Procure wisely, choosing modular, upgradeable hardware.
  3. Adopt clear policies on payloads, privacy, and data retention.
  4. Prioritize non-kinetic payloads such as cameras, sensors, and lighting.
  5. Prepare for BVLOS, which will transform municipal use once authorized.
  6. Ensure equity, supporting smaller cities through regional cooperation.

Conclusion

Drones are no longer experimental novelties. They are rapidly becoming a core municipal utility—a shared service as essential as public works fleets or GIS. Their greatest promise lies not in flashy technology but in the steady, practical benefits they bring: safer workers, faster response, better data, and more transparent government.

But the promise depends on choices. Cities must prohibit weaponized payloads, publish clear policies, train and retrain staff, and engage openly with their communities. Done right, drones can strengthen both city effectiveness and public trust.


Appendix A: Administrative Regulation on Payloads

Title: Drone Payloads and Weapons Prohibition; Data & Safety Controls
Number: AR-UAS-01
Effective Date: Upon issuance
Applies To: All city employees, contractors, volunteers, or agents operating drones (UAS) on behalf of the City


1. Purpose

This regulation ensures that all municipal drone operations are conducted lawfully, ethically, and safely. It establishes clear prohibitions on weaponized or harmful payloads and sets minimum standards for data use, transparency, and accountability.


2. Definitions

  • UAS (Drone): An uncrewed aircraft and associated equipment used for flight.
  • Payload: Any item attached to or carried by a UAS, including cameras, sensors, lights, speakers, or drop mechanisms.
  • Weaponized or Prohibited Payload: Any device or substance intended to incapacitate, injure, damage, or deliver kinetic, chemical, electrical, or incendiary effects.
  • Authorized Payload: Sensors or devices explicitly approved by the UAS Program Manager for municipal purposes.

3. Policy Statement

  • The City strictly prohibits the use of weaponized or prohibited payloads on all drones.
  • Drones may only be used for documented municipal purposes, consistent with law, FAA rules, and City policy.
  • All payloads must be inventoried and approved by the UAS Program Manager.

4. Prohibited Payloads

The following are expressly prohibited:

  • Firearms, ammunition, or explosive devices.
  • Pyrotechnic, incendiary, or chemical agents (including tear gas, pepper spray, smoke bombs).
  • Conducted electrical weapons (e.g., TASER-type devices).
  • Projectiles, hard object drop devices, or kinetic impact payloads intended for crowd control.
  • Covert audio or visual recording devices in violation of state or federal law.

Exception: Non-weaponized lifesaving payloads (e.g., flotation devices, first aid kits, rescue lines) may be deployed only with prior written approval of the Program Manager and after a documented risk assessment.


5. Authorized Payloads

Authorized payloads include, but are not limited to:

  • Imaging sensors (visual, thermal, multispectral, LiDAR).
  • Environmental sensors (methane detectors, gas analyzers, air quality monitors).
  • Lighting systems (searchlights, strobes).
  • Loudspeakers for announcements or evacuation instructions.
  • Non-weaponized emergency supply drops (medical kits, flotation devices).
  • Tethered systems for persistent observation or communications relay.

6. Oversight and Accountability

  • The UAS Program Manager must approve all payload configurations before deployment.
  • Departments must maintain an updated inventory of drones and payloads.
  • Quarterly inspections will be conducted to verify compliance.
  • An annual public report will summarize drone use, payload types, and incidents.

7. Data Controls

  • Minimization: Only record what is necessary for the mission.
  • Retention:
    • Non-evidentiary footage: 30–90 days.
    • Evidentiary footage: retained per case law.
    • Mapping/orthomosaics: retained per project records schedule.
  • Access: Role-based permissions, with audit logs.
  • Public Release: Media released under public records law must be reviewed for privacy and redaction (faces, license plates, sensitive sites).

8. Training Requirements

  • All operators must hold an FAA Part 107 Remote Pilot Certificate.
  • Annual city-approved training on:
    • This regulation (AR-UAS-01).
    • Privacy and data retention.
    • Citizen engagement and de-escalation.
  • Scenario-based training must be conducted at least once per year.

9. Enforcement

  • Violations of this regulation may result in disciplinary action up to and including termination of employment or contract.
  • Prohibited payloads will be confiscated, logged, and removed from service.
  • Cases involving unlawful weaponization will be referred for criminal investigation.

10. Effective Date

This regulation is effective immediately upon approval by the City Manager and shall remain in force until amended or rescinded.

Appendix B: FAA Part 107 Sample Questions (Representative, 25 Items)

Note: These questions are drawn from FAA study materials and training resources. They are not live exam questions but are representative of the knowledge areas tested.

  1. Under Part 107, what is the maximum allowable altitude for a small UAS?
     A. 200 feet AGL
     B. 400 feet AGL ✅
     C. 500 feet AGL
  2. What is the maximum ground speed allowed?
     A. 87 knots (100 mph) ✅
     B. 100 knots (115 mph)
     C. 87 mph
  3. To operate a small UAS for commercial purposes, which certification is required?
     A. Private Pilot Certificate
     B. Remote Pilot Certificate with a small UAS rating ✅
     C. Student Pilot Certificate
  4. Which airspace requires ATC authorization for UAS operations?
     A. Class G
     B. Class C ✅
     C. Class E below 400 ft
  5. How is controlled airspace authorization obtained?
     A. Verbal ATC request
     B. Filing a VFR flight plan
     C. Through LAANC or DroneZone ✅
  6. Minimum visibility requirement for Part 107 operations?
     A. 1 statute mile
     B. 3 statute miles ✅
     C. 5 statute miles
  7. Required distance from clouds?
     A. 500 feet below, 2,000 feet horizontally ✅
     B. 1,000 feet below, 1,000 feet horizontally
     C. No minimum distance
  8. A METAR states: KDAL 151853Z 14004KT 10SM FEW040 30/22 A2992. What is the ceiling?
     A. Clear skies
     B. 4,000 feet few clouds ✅
     C. 4,000 feet broken clouds
  9. A TAF includes BKN020. What does this mean?
     A. Broken clouds at 200 feet
     B. Broken clouds at 2,000 feet ✅
     C. Overcast at 20,000 feet
  10. High humidity combined with high temperature generally results in:
     A. Increased performance
     B. Reduced performance ✅
     C. No effect
  11. If a drone’s center of gravity is too far aft, what happens?
     A. Faster than normal flight
     B. Instability, difficult recovery ✅
     C. Less battery use
  12. High density altitude (hot, high, humid) causes:
     A. Increased battery life
     B. Decreased propeller efficiency, shorter flights ✅
     C. No effect
  13. A drone at max gross weight of 55 lbs carries a 10 lb payload. Payload percent?
     A. 18% ✅
     B. 10%
     C. 20%
  14. At maximum gross weight, performance is:
     A. Improved stability
     B. Reduced maneuverability and endurance ✅
     C. No change
  15. The purpose of Crew Resource Management is:
     A. To reduce paperwork
     B. To use teamwork and communication to improve safety ✅
     C. To reduce training costs
  16. GPS signal lost and drone drifts — first action?
     A. Immediate Return-to-Home
     B. Switch to ATTI/manual mode, maintain control, land ✅
     C. Climb higher for GPS
  17. If a drone causes $500+ in property damage, what is required?
     A. Report only to local police
     B. FAA report within 10 days ✅
     C. No report required
  18. If the remote PIC is incapacitated, the visual observer should:
     A. Land the drone ✅
     B. Call ATC
     C. Wait until PIC recovers
  19. On a sectional chart, a magenta vignette indicates:
     A. Class E starting at surface ✅
     B. Class C boundary
     C. Restricted airspace
  20. A dashed blue line on a sectional chart indicates:
     A. Class B airspace
     B. Class D airspace ✅
     C. Class G airspace
  21. A magenta dashed circle indicates:
     A. Class E starting at surface ✅
     B. Class G airspace
     C. No restrictions
  22. Floor of Class E when sectional shows fuzzy side of a blue vignette?
     A. Surface
     B. 700 feet AGL ✅
     C. 1,200 feet AGL
  23. Main concern with fatigue while flying?
     A. Reduced battery performance
     B. Slower reaction and poor decision-making ✅
     C. Increased radio interference
  24. Alcohol is prohibited within how many hours of UAS operation?
     A. 4 hours
     B. 8 hours ✅
     C. 12 hours
  25. Maximum allowable BAC for remote pilots?
     A. 0.08%
     B. 0.04% ✅
     C. 0.02%


I’m Back!

I see that my last post was in 2019. So, why start posting again? There are several reasons.

  1. I’ve actually been writing quite a bit – just not posting since most of my writings have been about personal matters.
  2. I now write in collaboration with AI, mostly ChatGPT. By the time I have had AI add, rewrite, and let me be the content guide and editor, is it Lewis or AI? Like I said, it is a collaboration in the truest since of the word.
  3. I’m heavily influenced by a Bible Study I am in as well as the ages and stages of life. Our oldest granddaughter, Lindsey, has now graduated from college, is teaching 4-year-old autistic children and living in her own apartment in downtown McKinney. Lily is a junior architectural student at Texas Tech. Anderson just left last Friday for Texas Tech as a freshman. He is planning to study business and computers. Kenneth & DeAnne are downsizing their home and plan to live in the historic district in Downtown McKinney. Linda & I are both 78, in so-so health, and are celebrating our 57th anniversary today. God is good, and all is well. Just happy to be alive!
  4. After years of being politically neutral as much as possible, with conservative leanings, I am full bore conservative/anti-woke and a Trump supporter now. My disdain for liberalism is greater than my support of conservativism.
  5. I still write about governmental finance topics even though my preferred subject stream is wherever my mind and heart are at any given moment. I still work close to 40 hours a week with my expertise being narrowed to Sales Tax Analyses as well as Multi-Year Financial Planning (MYFP). I love every minute of my consulting and will probably continue as long as I can use the keyboard.

    What this means is that if you are not interested in the type of topics I mostly write about these days, then I think there is a way you can unsubscribe on your own.

    If you think I have anything interesting to say, please forward to any of your friends, colleagues and family.

    Thank you!
    Lewis