A collaboration between Lewis McLain & AI

The church has always sung its theology. Long before statements of faith were printed and sermons were streamed, belief was carried on melody. That simple fact makes the current conversation about today’s praise music versus traditional hymns feel louder than it needs to be. This isn’t a battle between old truth and new sound. It’s a conversation about how truth travels—through time, language, culture, and the human heart.

When we listen carefully, the best of both traditions are not rivals. They are partners, each carrying something the other needs.

---

What Hymns Give Us: Weight, Memory, and Doctrine

Traditional hymns were forged in eras when literacy was uneven and theology had to be remembered. The result is astonishing density. A single verse can carry Scripture, creed, and lived experience all at once.

Think of Amazing Grace. In four short stanzas it compresses repentance, redemption, perseverance, and hope beyond death. Hymns are often:

• Doctrinally explicit – sin, grace, atonement, resurrection are named, not implied.
• Lyrically economical – every word earns its place.
• Communal by design – written for rooms without amplification, meant to be sung together, not performed.

Hymns teach believers how to speak to God with precision. They train the tongue and the mind. Over time, they build a shared theological vocabulary that survives when emotions fluctuate or circumstances darken.

---

What Praise Music Brings: Immediacy, Vulnerability, and Presence

Modern praise and worship music emerges from a different pressure point. It speaks to people formed by playlists, microphones, and a culture fluent in emotional expression. Where hymns often declare, praise songs frequently respond.

Contemporary worship—shaped in part by movements like Hillsong—tends to emphasize:

• Relational language – “You are with me,” “I need You,” “I surrender.”
• Extended musical space – repetition that allows reflection rather than information transfer.
• Accessibility – fewer metaphors, more everyday speech.

This music excels at helping people enter worship. It lowers the threshold for those who do not yet speak the older dialect of faith. It meets believers where they are emotionally and invites them forward.

---

Where the Tension Comes From

The friction is not really about guitars versus organs. It’s about formation.

• Hymns shape belief over decades.
• Praise songs shape attention in the moment.

When either is asked to do the other’s job exclusively, the system strains. A church built only on hymns may feel distant to newcomers. A church built only on praise music may struggle to pass on theological depth over generations.

The problem isn’t modern music. The problem is thin worship, whatever its style.

4

---

The Best of Both: A Fuller Ecology of Worship

Healthy worship traditions borrow wisely.

From hymns, contemporary worship can reclaim lyrical rigor—songs that say something true even when the feeling fades. From praise music, hymnody can rediscover emotional honesty—permission to bring weakness, doubt, and longing before God without polish.

Some churches already live in this overlap: a historic hymn reframed with a new arrangement; a modern song that quotes Scripture as carefully as a psalm; a service where declaration and response take turns.

This isn’t compromise. It’s continuity.

---

A Final Thought: What We Sing Becomes What We Believe

Music lodges belief in places sermons rarely reach. At hospital bedsides. At graves. In moments when words run out. That makes the question of what we sing more important than how we sing it.

The best worship does not choose between old and new. It chooses truth, beauty, and endurance—songs sturdy enough to carry faith forward and tender enough to meet the present moment.

The church has always sung its way through history. The wisest congregations will keep doing so, drawing from the deep wells behind them while still listening for new songs worth carrying into the future.